“The Cuckoo’s” Egg, Then and Now

Sometimes it’s fun and educational to go back in time to the early stages of Cybersecurity and Information Security: In 1986, a meager 75-cent billing discrepancy led one Clifford Stoll to uncover Markus Hess, a West German hacker selling U.S. military secrets to the KGB. Cliff’s book The Cuckoo’s Egg became a touchstone for cyber-forensics. What started as a minor anomaly revealed a global espionage pipeline.

What happened

• Clifford Stoll, a systems manager at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LNBL), chased a tiny 75-cent accounting discrepancy in the lab’s time-sharing bill and discovered an unauthorized account on a local machine.
• Stoll followed the intruder’s activity for months, recording sessions, enlisting telephone tracing and other agencies, and discovered the attacker was hopping through networks and satellite links back to West Germany.
• To keep the attacker connected long enough to trace him and to bait him into revealing more about his actions, Stoll created a fake account and fake files about a fictitious detail of the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative – a.k.a. “Reagan’s Star Wars”) project – a deception that worked and produced key forensic leads. This episode is one of the earliest well-documented uses of what we now call a “honeypot”.
• The intruder was identified as Markus Hess, a West German hacker who, according to investigations, hacked into many U.S. military and contractor systems and sold information (via intermediaries) to Soviet intelligence (the KGB). The case became an early, prominent example of state-sponsored electronic espionage.
• German authorities arrested Hess shortly after. He was tried (around 1990) and convicted in connection with espionage-related break-ins.
• Stoll published his firsthand account as The Cuckoo’s Egg (1989), which influenced early thinking about intrusion detection, incident response, and cyber-forensics.
• The case also exposed how lax passwords and network trust practices were then, and it proved that even tiny anomalies can signal massive breaches. It birthed concepts like honeypots and incident-response playbooks, and helped push organizations to take network security seriously.

Why it still matters

• Then: a lone operator, weak passwords, and trusting networks let an individual reach sensitive systems and sell national security of the western world, simply for personal gain. Stoll’s response (patient logging, cooperating with carriers and law enforcement, and baiting the intruder) became core incident-response lore.
• Now: the same goal – access to sensitive data, or operational disruption – is available to threat actors at the wave of a credit card. “Hacking-as-a-service” providers let relatively unsophisticated actors hire ready-made tools and infrastructure to carry out attacks for low cost and at high scale. That commoditization turns yesterday’s rare nation-state tradecraft into today’s all too frequent incidents. Attacks today are literally built to order and available at bargain rates.

Motives determine the target

When assessing the real risk vs. fear mongering, one has to ask: what is the motivation of the attacker?

In Stoll’s incident, Hess and his peers were motivated by money and politics – stealing military access and selling it to the KGB. Today, motivations are far more diverse. Some attackers want ransom payments, others aim to cause disruption or chaos, and still others operate under the direction of governments or terroristic organizations to gather intelligence or undermine critical services.

That motive shapes the target:

• If the goal is quick cash, exposed individuals, small businesses, hospitals, or municipalities may be hit, simply because they are vulnerable.
• If the goal is strategic disruption, water systems, power grids, or transport hubs become high-value marks.
• And when the goal is commercial espionage or competitive pressure, manufacturers and service providers are targeted – especially in complex, intertwined industries like automotive, electronics, aerospace, biotech, or even entertainment.

This is why the conversation cannot stop at “hackers are out there.” It must move to:

What do we have that someone might want (assets), and how easy is it for them to get it (risks)? And what risk can we accept, or need to mitigate against?

That is the pivot from abstract fear to concrete threats – and it explains why water works, local utilities, and small organizations remain very much in the crosshairs today.

Critical Infrastructure: Water Systems at Risk

Water and wastewater utilities remain soft targets. CISA, EPA, and FBI advisories show attackers are already probing and, in some cases, successfully disrupting operations. Outdated Operational Technology (OT), thin budgets, lack of necessary awareness and expertise for complex security, and poor segmentation make them high-impact, low-resilience victims.

Immediate actions:

1. Segment Operational Technology (OT) from Information Technology (IT) and lock down remote access (“air gap” and isolate).
2. Use Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all accounts, especially if critical or admin authority.
3. Watch for and treat small anomalies – like Stoll’s 75¢ discrepancy – as early warnings.
4. Maintain 3-2-1 backups (3 copies, 2 different backup media, 1 offsite copy) and incident-response playbooks.
5. Leverage CISA’s sector-specific toolkits.
6. Define Security Ownership and implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS)

Beyond Water: ISMS Standards That Strengthen Every Organization

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)

• Provides a universal language for managing risk: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.
• Flexible – applies to small townships, manufacturers, or global enterprises.
• Encourages continuous improvement rather than one-time compliance.

TISAX® (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange)

• Tailored but not limited to automotive suppliers and service providers.
• Enforces strict third-party assessments of information handling, supplier risk, and compliance with automotive OEM requirements.
• Increasingly a market access necessity in the automotive sector: no certification, no business.

Entertainment Industry Standards (TPN, MPA, CDSA)

• The Trusted Partner Network (TPN), supported by the Motion Picture Association (MPA), sets baseline security requirements for studios, streaming platforms, and vendors handling pre-release content.
• Content Delivery & Security Association (CDSA) provides means to protect intellectual property in post-production, distribution, and broadcast workflows.
• These frameworks exist because leaked or pirated content can destroy revenue streams – making studios treat cybersecurity as a business-continuity issue, not just IT hygiene.

Why they matter together:

• NIST: the broad, U.S.-centric baseline that public and private organizations can adopt.
• TISAX®: a binding framework that extends this discipline into a specific, high-risk supply chain.
• TPN/CDSA: industry-driven standards where intellectual property is the crown jewel.
• All three embody the same lesson from Clifford Stoll’s era: enforced controls, traceability, and accountability.
• Whether it’s safe drinking water, military secrets, the latest self-driving car CPU, or unreleased plot twists of a blockbuster show: a structured framework makes the difference between being an easy mark or a hardened target for threat actors.

Bottom Line

From the Cuckoo’s Egg to ransomware marketplaces, the mechanics have changed but the core lesson has not: small anomalies are big warnings. Today, defenders in water, manufacturing, and beyond must treat security frameworks not as paperwork but as survival strategies. Attackers don’t need to invent anymore – they just need to rent from untraceable bidders.

Ready for the next step toward security? We’re happy to help.

#Water #DrinkingWater #CriticalInfrastructure #ISMS #InfoSec #InformationSecurity #CyberSecurity #ISO27001 #AWIA #TISAX #Automotive #RiskManagement #GSInfoSec